Thursday, February 6, 2014
Post 3
I really liked how in the second reading the listed outright what were the things they noticed. However I think that they made it a bit list like. I would have liked for them to provide one or two then go in-depth about them instead of just listing. By doing that they would have made the entry seem more organized and flowing like the first reading in the CCM book. I liked how the Author of this made connections between the fire and the separation of him and Hana. It invoked more of a reaction because we were really thinking about he was loosing everything and he is helpless to do anything about it. Yes, he can try and stop the fire but he will have some burnt things and it will take him a while to rebuild. He will not be the same but at the same time it gives him the opportunity to move on.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I agree with you when you say they made there paper more of a list then an actual analyze. I noticed this also while reading it. I thought the paper was more of a summary in detail and not really enough of deep thinking. The paper could of been better if, like you said, they talked about one or two things they noticed while reading then went more in-depth and talked about there own interpretation. This way the reader can get a sense of what the writer believes is happening and can compare and contrast to their own personal thoughts. Over all, good blog post! I liked your ideas about each reading.
ReplyDelete